HIFI-FORUM » English » Stereo (Engl.) » POLL | |
|
POLL+A -A |
||
Autor |
| |
Prithvi
Stammgast |
03:45
![]() |
#1
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
Hi! All you guys out there. Lets know how many 2-ch freaks are there versus HT freaks. Lets do a poll and see what are the results. we can have:- 1. 2CH (STEREO) 2. HT 3. 50:50 (2CH:HT) Anyone game on this. Rgds PRithvi |
||
big-ears
Stammgast |
03:48
![]() |
#2
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
Hi Prithvi, It is 80 (2ch) / 20 (HT) for me. Cheers |
||
|
||
benkenobi
Hat sich gelöscht |
04:05
![]() |
#3
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
ditto |
||
viv
Ist häufiger hier |
04:55
![]() |
#4
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
i am for choice 1. 2 ch (stereo) Ben/Big-ears, 80/20 is not standing for elections. so your votes are invalied!! ![]() Viv |
||
big-ears
Stammgast |
05:03
![]() |
#5
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
Exactly, Viv. Am somewhat unsure as to where I stand in this poll, and so haven't voted! Maybe Prithvi needs to introduce one more candidate to the fray. Cheers |
||
TROJAN_HORSE
Gesperrt |
05:08
![]() |
#6
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
No 5.1 or 2 ch stereo.I'm a mono HT fan ![]() |
||
benkenobi
Hat sich gelöscht |
05:16
![]() |
#7
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
Hey viv, so true. but given the limited choices i would vote for my first love 2 ch. ![]() ![]() Cheers, Ben |
||
big-ears
Stammgast |
05:17
![]() |
#8
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
TJ, Going by monickers, that would possibly be Sub's domain. |
||
SUB_BOSS
Gesperrt |
05:18
![]() |
#9
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
I'm still in a transition from HT to pure stereo, but will bet my ass that 2ch set up will dig your as* deeper than a HT set up... ![]() ![]() |
||
abhi.pani
Inventar |
05:35
![]() |
#10
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
Its 75:25 (Stereo:HT) for me and I must agree that I am yet to start with any transition like Sub-Boss. I like movies and their effects give me much better kick in the surround mode than in the Stereo mode so cant forget them altogether..... ![]() For Music nothing can replace Stereo to my ears yet....so its still 75:25 !!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
sivat
Stammgast |
08:53
![]() |
#11
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
.....assuming you want one solution for your audio requirement. 1) Pure stereo - Try something like NAD or CA electronics (CDP + Amp) along with good speakers : Budget : Rs.50,000 to "no limit" 2) HT Only - Try something like HTB's or entry level separates from yamaha, sony, etc. Budget Rs.15,000 to Rs.1,00,000 3) 50% Stereo + 50% HT - then look at (i) Denon AV 3805 / Arcam A300, etc., (ii) Mid-End players like Pioneer 733 and (iii) good set of 5 speakers : Budget : Rs. 1.8 lakhs to 5 lakhs 4) For those Rich folks, who want 75% Stereo + 25% HT....look at (i) hi-end DVD/universal player from Denon, Arcam, Linn etc., (ii) a processor from Rotel or Proceed or Krell, (iii) a multi-channel power amp from Parasound, Rotel, Krell, etc., and (iv) 5 excellent Speakers : Budget Rs.5 lakhs to "No limit" Best solution is to keep Stereo and HT Setup separately. Its actually cost-effective that way ![]() I think what prithvi really wants to know is whether individuals would desire Stereo (or) HT alone (or) a HT system that will compromise a bit of stereo. Given the choices what system would you prefer to purchase ? (Those who would prefer to buy two separate system for Stereo and HT, should ideally vote for "Stereo") Prithvi, correct me if i'm wrong... Cheers Siva. |
||
abhi.pani
Inventar |
09:05
![]() |
#12
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
Now, that is a better representation...... ![]() But it has come a bit late from you Mr.Siva because I have already voted..... ![]() ![]() As far as separate Stereo and HT setup is concerned....I think that is what most members on this forum (who even think of HT) would want for themselves !!!! ![]() ![]() I still suggest Prithvi to add one more option to the list for a more "ACCURATE" polling. ![]() |
||
Prithvi
Stammgast |
10:27
![]() |
#13
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
Sorry Siva & Abhi, Ur both wrong. Sorry abhi no more options. The poll is how many guys love 2ch alone, HT alone or 50/50. Period. Personally I love 2ch only, no HT for me (my wife see's this I am really going to get it:cut)no wonder I dont ever intend having a HT at home. To each his own!:D Rgds Prithvi |
||
viv
Ist häufiger hier |
10:40
![]() |
#14
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
That will be the case for my wife also yaar..she prefers movies to pure music. But for me..MUSIC RULES!!!! ![]() After doing some intense coding in the day....evening relaxation with music is real joy. I think I should add this to my signature....MUSIC RULES!!!! what say ? ![]() |
||
abhi.pani
Inventar |
10:56
![]() |
#15
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
Ok, Prithvi then what do you mean by 50:50 ? Is it the ratio of amount of likeness towards each type or the Components ratio one wants to have at home ? ![]() The two things are quite different I suppose, because they two are for entirely different purposes (though some people try to integrate them into one, and forgetting DVD Audio for the present). Inclination towards movies will always appeal someone to have a HT but that doesnt dilute his interest towards Stereo Music...right !!! In that case what does he Vote ? ![]() ![]() ![]() If you have to stick two these three options then you got to show the proper way to vote !! ![]() If you say Siva is wrong then Please correct him. ![]() ![]() |
||
SUB_BOSS
Gesperrt |
11:06
![]() |
#16
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
Hey abhi ..mann cool it if u like movies as well as music it's the same here...but due to $$ constraints we priorotise...so it's stereo first for me..... ![]() |
||
abhi.pani
Inventar |
12:09
![]() |
#17
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
Hey Sub, I am cool....but this discussion is interesting so getting into the thick of the things.. As far as money is concerned, that is always a hmmmm.... But yes I would definitely like to have both, with almost first 70% of my money going into stereo and 30% to HT(step by step). Obviously there will be some common components like the towers. Yes, it is difficult and almost impossible for starters like us to get everything in one shot, we got to build step by step. You have already taken the first step Sub and I am on the verge of taking it... But where is Prithvi....he got to answer our questions !! He cant leave us in the middle of this macho discussion.... |
||
abhi.pani
Inventar |
12:10
![]() |
#18
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
Hey Sub, I am cool....but this discussion is interesting so getting into the thick of the things.. ![]() As far as money is concerned, that is always a hmmmm.... ![]() But yes I would definitely like to have both, with almost first 70% of my money going into stereo and 30% to HT(step by step). Obviously there will be some common components like the towers. ![]() Yes, it is difficult and almost impossible for starters like us to get everything in one shot, we got to build step by step. You have already taken the first step Sub and I am on the verge of taking it... ![]() But where is Prithvi....he got to answer our questions !! ![]() He cant leave us in the middle of this macho discussion.... ![]() |
||
Aniruddha
Ist häufiger hier |
12:57
![]() |
#19
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
Hi! 2hundred percent 2channel... Aniruddha. |
||
roshan
Ist häufiger hier |
13:40
![]() |
#20
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
100% 2 C stereo. Roshan. |
||
tidelpower
Ist häufiger hier |
13:43
![]() |
#21
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
2 Channel! While am yet to get my first system - Its gonna be pure 2 Ch. HT is a different game - and a different section too ! cheers! ![]() |
||
square_wave
Inventar |
14:43
![]() |
#22
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
Two channel all the way. |
||
neckie
Ist häufiger hier |
15:20
![]() |
#23
erstellt: 28. Apr 2005, |
Stereo all the way. HT did not amaze me the way pure stereo did. Imaging changed the way i listened to music. i recently got an HK 230, it's good, cheesy stuff, but, stereo rules and i think it'll stay tht way, forever. |
||
|
|
Das könnte Dich auch interessieren: |
What is your personal preference : Pure Stereo or HT? Prithvi am 28.04.2005 – Letzte Antwort am 29.04.2005 – 20 Beiträge |
SOME SERIOUSNESS NEED BADLY ON THIS FORUM Prithvi am 04.04.2005 – Letzte Antwort am 08.04.2005 – 29 Beiträge |
Do you know these cables? Webon am 22.10.2003 – Letzte Antwort am 15.12.2003 – 58 Beiträge |
How old are you? Shahrukh am 04.11.2005 – Letzte Antwort am 12.11.2005 – 67 Beiträge |
Dealer Poll SUB_BOSS am 23.05.2005 – Letzte Antwort am 29.05.2005 – 7 Beiträge |
What can we do to make the dubious dealers accountable? Dare_Devil am 04.08.2006 – Letzte Antwort am 09.08.2006 – 55 Beiträge |
How Vinyl Records are born Prithvi am 15.03.2007 – Letzte Antwort am 19.03.2007 – 21 Beiträge |
What music do you use to test for Bass Response ? Arj am 25.12.2005 – Letzte Antwort am 29.12.2005 – 11 Beiträge |
Buying on the Net purnendu am 29.04.2005 – Letzte Antwort am 25.08.2005 – 11 Beiträge |
how about this Sonic_Master am 02.06.2005 – Letzte Antwort am 03.06.2005 – 4 Beiträge |
Foren Archiv
2005
Anzeige
Produkte in diesem Thread
Aktuelle Aktion
Top 10 Threads in Stereo (Engl.) der letzten 7 Tage
- Good speakers for old system
- Jamo Concert E750 and E770
- Replacing Stock Jumpers on NAD/Marantz
- FYI: Cadence latest price list
- One speaker "louder" than the other?
- TNT triple T loudspeaker cable
- Vincent SV 231
- Planar speakers
- Best Amp for Quad 11L? Nad vs Rotel vs Marantz vs CA
- Is Jamo E-series worth it?
Top 10 Threads in Stereo (Engl.) der letzten 50 Tage
- Good speakers for old system
- Jamo Concert E750 and E770
- Replacing Stock Jumpers on NAD/Marantz
- FYI: Cadence latest price list
- One speaker "louder" than the other?
- TNT triple T loudspeaker cable
- Vincent SV 231
- Planar speakers
- Best Amp for Quad 11L? Nad vs Rotel vs Marantz vs CA
- Is Jamo E-series worth it?
Top 10 Suchanfragen
Forumsstatistik
- Registrierte Mitglieder928.447 ( Heute: 7 )
- Neuestes Mitgliedkentonheinig8
- Gesamtzahl an Themen1.558.233
- Gesamtzahl an Beiträgen21.697.342