HIFI-FORUM » English » Stereo (Engl.) » Bass Tilt, Treble Tilt and how its useful | |
|
Bass Tilt, Treble Tilt and how its useful+A -A |
|||
Autor |
| ||
Sonic_Master
Stammgast |
05:15
![]() |
#1
erstellt: 07. Dez 2005, ||
One of the prestine feature of Active speakers is that we can adjust the Bass tilt and Treble tilt. The advantage of the above feature is that its all about room equalization and for flat frequency response... This feature is not possible with the passive speakers.... No matter how flat your speakers are in practice you get a serious dip in the spectrum. In order to compensate this we need this kind of feature. the pic of the bass tilt and Treble tilt... and watch the freq response... how amazingly it can be adjusted irrespective of the room and reduces the acoustic complexity... the pic... ![]() need comments cheers, Sandeep |
|||
deaf
Stammgast |
06:18
![]() |
#2
erstellt: 07. Dez 2005, ||
Dear sonic master, The function you illustrate cannot compensate for room related problems,it can only work on soffit mounted monitors where the back wall is negated and the speaker driver sees an infinte baffle with no diffraction issues and quater wave cancellations. Even the most sophisticated digital room correction systems are limited in their abilities(for freestading speakers) below 200Hz, and above 700Hz corrections are meaningless in more than one position.Tilt control features are available in passive systems too,but in the preamp section.The Quad preamplifiers feature tilt functions in their design.Tilt controls can only compensate for recording problems. The most elegant way to remove the room from the equation is to have a speaker with a cardiod pattern in the frequencies above 150Hz and a pressure-gardient pattern below it.This sort of speaker(active or passive ) will act in a friendly way with most rooms.However the sweet spot is limited in size and the tonal balance usually is not to everyones' taste. Regards Deaf. |
|||
|
|||
Krish
Stammgast |
13:30
![]() |
#3
erstellt: 07. Dez 2005, ||
Could you please elucidate, in slightly layman terms ![]() |
|||
Arj
Inventar |
13:35
![]() |
#4
erstellt: 07. Dez 2005, ||
for CDP sources, would prefer an equilisers in the digital domain (Like behringer) than in the analogue domain as in tine controls. appears more cleaner to me ! |
|||
deaf
Stammgast |
17:48
![]() |
#5
erstellt: 07. Dez 2005, ||
Double edged sword my friend. Deaf |
|||
deaf
Stammgast |
17:50
![]() |
#6
erstellt: 07. Dez 2005, ||
Dear Krish It means it has a cardiod radiation pattern above 150 cycles and a figure of 8 radiation pattern below 150 cycles. Regards Deaf. |
|||
sivat
Stammgast |
06:16
![]() |
#7
erstellt: 08. Dez 2005, ||
Agree with Deaf. The implication on tonal quality is inevitable. I would invest that money in simple room treatments.. Arj, i would think it would be even worse to do room-correction in digital domain (given the limitations of sampling)... Cheers Siva. |
|||
Sonic_Master
Stammgast |
07:55
![]() |
#8
erstellt: 08. Dez 2005, ||
well siva.. but im not talking about in the digital domain...I am talkin about in the active crossover section.. I dont think there would be any tonal quality deformation would occur with such modifications... cheers, Sandeep |
|||
deaf
Stammgast |
08:21
![]() |
#9
erstellt: 08. Dez 2005, ||
Dear Sonic Master I think the answer to that one is my first post on this thread.Tilting driver response does not solve issues,lets say a 6-10db suckout at 100Hz and a 4db boost at 50Hz.This a real world problem that exists in most rooms.How do you resolve this.Just going active does nothing for this problem.Any sort of EQ will screw up things even more.I gave a suggestion on the ideal speaker polar pattern,all of you should look at the idea more carefully. Regards Deaf. |
|||
Arj
Inventar |
08:41
![]() |
#10
erstellt: 08. Dez 2005, ||
Personally I am not in favour of putting anything in the purity of sound.. so I am not too hot on this either. But this was the suggestion given by a TAS reviewer (pretty well known) for ideal room response. of course he uses the much more expensive TACT2.2 appreantly there are some "Bumps" which can never be changed by room treatment due to the inherent dimensions of the room. As as long as your speaker is well designed, the only way to make the response as flat a possible (Without making it sound bad)is via digital EQ. this can be made Not to affect the sound by making the sampling rate many times higher than the standard 44.1, making the correction and then downsampling back to 44.1 to feed the DAC. Aparently it works, but have never heard one so cannot really comment more ! |
|||
deaf
Stammgast |
09:05
![]() |
#11
erstellt: 08. Dez 2005, ||
Dear Arj. Do you think the local Audioplus daeler can resolve an issue,if one did crop up with regards to this product.I think Mr.Ahuja himself would have to come and do the honours as he seems to be the only gent with the knowledge to crack a room related problem. Regards Deaf. |
|||
|
|
Das könnte Dich auch interessieren: |
Bass & Treble in Stereo SUNILYO am 14.07.2006 – Letzte Antwort am 17.07.2006 – 25 Beiträge |
Dubai. How cheap and where? goodears am 21.03.2005 – Letzte Antwort am 11.04.2005 – 7 Beiträge |
suggestions >>>highend preamp and cost and its performance>>> Sonic_Master am 23.08.2005 – Letzte Antwort am 29.08.2005 – 9 Beiträge |
Differences in how we hear..its in the brain Arj am 09.05.2006 – Letzte Antwort am 14.05.2006 – 13 Beiträge |
Its Alive.its alliive. Savyasaachi am 11.06.2006 – Letzte Antwort am 11.06.2006 – 2 Beiträge |
How to identify Coloured Bass ?? abhi.pani am 24.03.2005 – Letzte Antwort am 28.03.2005 – 11 Beiträge |
How Vinyl Records are born Prithvi am 15.03.2007 – Letzte Antwort am 19.03.2007 – 21 Beiträge |
How important is impedance matching? zhopudey am 06.10.2007 – Letzte Antwort am 17.10.2007 – 10 Beiträge |
How to get better bass in a small untreated room? zhopudey am 24.10.2007 – Letzte Antwort am 25.10.2007 – 9 Beiträge |
Monitor Audio Bronze1 and B2 hifinovice1 am 02.03.2005 – Letzte Antwort am 03.03.2005 – 3 Beiträge |
Foren Archiv
2005
Anzeige
Top Produkte in Stereo (Engl.)
Aktuelle Aktion
Top 10 Threads in Stereo (Engl.) der letzten 7 Tage
- Good speakers for old system
- Jamo Concert E750 and E770
- Replacing Stock Jumpers on NAD/Marantz
- FYI: Cadence latest price list
- One speaker "louder" than the other?
- TNT triple T loudspeaker cable
- Vincent SV 231
- Planar speakers
- Best Amp for Quad 11L? Nad vs Rotel vs Marantz vs CA
- Is Jamo E-series worth it?
Top 10 Threads in Stereo (Engl.) der letzten 50 Tage
- Good speakers for old system
- Jamo Concert E750 and E770
- Replacing Stock Jumpers on NAD/Marantz
- FYI: Cadence latest price list
- One speaker "louder" than the other?
- TNT triple T loudspeaker cable
- Vincent SV 231
- Planar speakers
- Best Amp for Quad 11L? Nad vs Rotel vs Marantz vs CA
- Is Jamo E-series worth it?
Top 10 Suchanfragen
Forumsstatistik
- Registrierte Mitglieder928.473 ( Heute: 14 )
- Neuestes MitgliedShawnglicK
- Gesamtzahl an Themen1.558.279
- Gesamtzahl an Beiträgen21.698.736